SKU: 88120597802

1500W Solar UFO Motion Sensor All in one Solar Garden Street Light With Remote Control

$134.95 $149.95
Save 10%
No.2 Bestseller on duoplus.be >

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 9 - Jul 14

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

1500W Solar UFO Motion Sensor All in one Solar Garden Street Light With Remote ControlProduct Description Product Advantage All in one integrated solar garden and street light for public square, plaza, courtyard, garden, park, street, roadway, pathway, parking lot, private road, sidewalk, campus, airfield, farm & ranch, perimeter security, wildlife area, military base etc. The integrated solar street light is an intelligent outdoor lighting system that integrates the best energy saving parts solar panel, led lamp ,sensor, controller

Product Description




Product Advantage

  • All in one integrated solar garden and street light for public square, plaza, courtyard, garden, park, street, roadway, pathway, parking lot, private road, sidewalk, campus, airfield, farm & ranch, perimeter security, wildlife area, military base etc.
  • The integrated solar street light is an intelligent outdoor lighting system that integrates the best energy saving parts---solar panel, led lamp ,sensor, controller and lithium battery all in one box.
  • During the day the highly efficient solar panel collects energy from the sun and stores the power in the advanced lithium battery.
  • At night the powerful Led would automatically be turned on providing light. When motion is detected, the Led would increase in brightness to provide an abundance of extra lighting for anyone in the area.
  • After 20 seconds or when motion is no longer detected, the light drops down in brightness to conserve power.
  • This intelligent feature allows the solar powered street light to save power when no one is in range or utilizing the light, meaning a much longer run time than you would expect from a similar size solar lighting.

Parking lot

 

 

Garage Light

Barn Light

 

Pathway Light

Garden Light

Features

 

- built-in motion and light sensors. The motion sensors can detect movement up to 26 feet within an angle of 120 degrees. When turned on, the light stays on dim mode. However, when it detects movement, the light automatically turns brighter and stays on for about 30 seconds or more.


- Made out of high-quality plastic material that allows it to withstand various weather conditions. It has an IP-65 rating, meaning it is waterproof and is resistant to heat, rust, dust, frost and other elements.


- Come with a wide solar panel and 20000 MAH rechargeable LiFePO4 battery. I like this combination since it boasts a high conversion rate and thus, a faster charging time and longer working use.


- Keep it on bright with remote control , 1/2/3 hours timer to choose. Mode adjustable too.


- These versions are designed with an IP65 waterproof rating, and they can also resist surge and dust. The kit contains the installation accessories set. You can effortlessly mount them on a tree, pole, balcony, wall, or any desired outdoor spot. These solar powered street lamps can be instantly mounted as long as there is a wall or a pole.


- There is no need to handle wiring jobs, and these units only require minimal maintenance. You can readily utilize them so long as they are fully recharged by the sunlight.


- These lights work reliably as long as it is dark, so you don’t need to do the job of switching the street lights on manually. Such versions can help you save more on your energy bills. Lighting your pathway and other outdoor spaces does not need to be costly.


-Application: Outdoor wall or pole in Plaza, Park, Garden, Courtyard, Street, Walkway, Pathway, Campus, Farm, Perimeter Security etc…


Note: If the sun is not enough, the battery may not be fully charged, so the lighting time and brightness will be affected.


 

Product Name                                 UFO  Integrated all in one solar street light solar garden light
Model No. LTUFO001 LTUFO002 LTUFO003
Watts 1200W 2000W 1500W
Led Chips 240PCS SMD5730 400PCS SMD5730 360PCS SMD5730
Lamp Size 420*420*125mm        460*460*135mm         460*460*135mm  
Solar panel 18W Polycrystalline 22W Polycrystalline 22W Polycrystalline
Battery type LiFeO4 20AH LiFeO4 20AH LiFeO4 20AH
Suggestion Install height 3-4m 3-4m 3-4m
CCT(Color Temperature)                                                    3000K-6500K
Material of housing
                                                  ABS
Charging time
                                                          6-8h
Discharging time                                                  10-12h per day
Working mode                      Light control+PIR motion sensor+remote control
Applications        street, highway,garden,square,countryside or any other outdoor plac


Product details

 

 

Working mode


Installation method



Applications

- The universal All-In-One Solar Street Light with PIR Motion Sensor Security Lamp delivers reliable long-lasting lighting and is ideal for maintaining casual, security or emergency lighting around the house, garage, garden, porches, patios, balconies & verandas, side and backyard, aisles, driveway, stairs, entryway, path, fence etc.

- Applicable to light up public areas including Parks, Parking lots, Roads, Streets, Playgrounds, walkways, pathways etc. 

- Great as an outdoor Perimeter Security Light for residential or commercial property.

- Suitable for industrial and business premises including parking, strata buildings, warehouses, cafes, hotels, coal mines, farms and farm fields, campuses and buildings etc. 




Product Advantage

  • All in one integrated solar garden and street light for public square, plaza, courtyard, garden, park, street, roadway, pathway, parking lot, private road, sidewalk, campus, airfield, farm & ranch, perimeter security, wildlife area, military base etc.
  • The integrated solar street light is an intelligent outdoor lighting system that integrates the best energy saving parts---solar panel, led lamp ,sensor, controller and lithium battery all in one box.
  • During the day the highly efficient solar panel collects energy from the sun and stores the power in the advanced lithium battery.
  • At night the powerful Led would automatically be turned on providing light. When motion is detected, the Led would increase in brightness to provide an abundance of extra lighting for anyone in the area.
  • After 20 seconds or when motion is no longer detected, the light drops down in brightness to conserve power.
  • This intelligent feature allows the solar powered street light to save power when no one is in range or utilizing the light, meaning a much longer run time than you would expect from a similar size solar lighting.
Features

 

- built-in motion and light sensors. The motion sensors can detect movement up to 26 feet within an angle of 120 degrees. When turned on, the light stays on dim mode. However, when it detects movement, the light automatically turns brighter and stays on for about 30 seconds or more.

 

- Made out of high-quality plastic material that allows it to withstand various weather conditions. It has an IP-65 rating, meaning it is waterproof and is resistant to heat, rust, dust, frost and other elements.

 

- Come with a wide solar panel and 20000 MAH rechargeable LiFePO4 battery. I like this combination since it boasts a high conversion rate and thus, a faster charging time and longer working use.

 

- Keep it on bright with remote control , 1/2/3 hours timer to choose. Mode adjustable too.


- These versions are designed with an IP65 waterproof rating, and they can also resist surge and dust. The kit contains the installation accessories set. You can effortlessly mount them on a tree, pole, balcony, wall, or any desired outdoor spot. These solar powered street lamps can be instantly mounted as long as there is a wall or a pole.


- There is no need to handle wiring jobs, and these units only require minimal maintenance. You can readily utilize them so long as they are fully recharged by the sunlight.

 

- These lights work reliably as long as it is dark, so you don’t need to do the job of switching the street lights on manually. Such versions can help you save more on your energy bills. Lighting your pathway and other outdoor spaces does not need to be costly.


-Application: Outdoor wall or pole in Plaza, Park, Garden, Courtyard, Street, Walkway, Pathway, Campus, Farm, Perimeter Security etc…

 

Note: If the sun is not enough, the battery may not be fully charged, so the lighting time and brightness will be affected.

 

Applications

- The universal All-In-One Solar Street Light with PIR Motion Sensor Security Lamp delivers reliable long-lasting lighting and is ideal for maintaining casual, security or emergency lighting around the house, garage, garden, porches, patios, balconies & verandas, side and backyard, aisles, driveway, stairs, entryway, path, fence etc.

- Applicable to light up public areas including Parks, Parking lots, Roads, Streets, Playgrounds, walkways, pathways etc. 

- Great as an outdoor Perimeter Security Light for residential or commercial property.

- Suitable for industrial and business premises including parking, strata buildings, warehouses, cafes, hotels, coal mines, farms and farm fields, campuses and buildings etc. 

 

Model No.
LTUFO001
Light Type
Solar LED
Rated Power
120w
Voltage
3.2V
Product name
UFO solar street garden light
Color Temperature
6500K cool white
Material
ABS
Battery
20AH
Charging time
6-8hours
Working mode
Light&Radar PIR sensor+remote controller
Solar panel
6V/15W
Number of lamp beads
240PCS SMD5730
Waterproof grade
IP65
Lighting time
10-12hours
Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 88120597802

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 919 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
A
[email protected]
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 3
Good to excellent content - terrible publishing policy
Format: Hardcover
Lewis (Not "Flewis") wrote a decent text a number of years ago. It was then expanded to a companion volume (Analytical Sedimentology) with another author. The two nicely complement each other but the mind boggles at a price of almost $100 per each. The publisher has clearly made little effort to control the cost. Redundancy between the two volumes is excessive, hard cover rather than soft is used and, indeed, both could easily have been combined in one less pricey volume. A valuable resource to students and professionals has therefore been compromised by publisher, author or both due to ignorance, greed or stupidity. A terrible shame!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 5, 1998
J
Verified Purchase
JMB1014
Boise, US
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Introduction to Legal and Constitutional Reasoning
Format: Hardcover
This is an excellent introductory volume for people who feel confused by the debate over "original intent" versus a "living Constitution." David A. Strauss is a law professor at the University of Chicago. His book is a quick read (139 pages), with no notes, bibliography or other impedimenta - just an index. It's a very lucid explanation of legal reasoning and how the Supreme Court has followed this basic process over time. Hence the "living constitution" is really just an instance of the English common law tradition functioning normally. This book will teach many Americans how legal reasoning actually operates in practice. It is a common-sensical and conservative process that seeks at once to promote predictability and fairness. By and large, it has worked well. The phrase "living Constitution" has been denigrated by people who seek to turn back the calendar to a day when more "traditional" values were imposed by law. In so doing, they have invoked an historical fiction, the "original intent" of the framers of the Constitution. The myriad problems arising from this effort, if not its disingenuousness, have been discussed with insight and erudition by such excellent minds as Jack Rakove ("Original Meanings")and Akhil Reed Amar ("The Bill of Rights," and "The American Constitution: A Biography"), to name just two. The real point of this book, I think, is to explain basic legal reasoning to a mass audience. This does a great service. It also shows how naturally the common law evolves, how it tends to restrain judicial activism and yet to permit flexibility as times and circumstances change. As Dean Roscoe Pound of the Harvard Law School put it in his book, "The Spirit of the Common Law," the common law is "essentially a mode of judicial and juristic thinking, a mode of treating legal problems rather than a fixed body of definite rules...." This is a critical distinction. Some so-called conservatives insist that judges must simply apply the law like automatons, as if it were a "fixed body of definite rules." They then seek to enlist the founding fathers in declaring what those rules are, or how definite they must be. But as Dean Pound and centuries of legal history demonstrate, this notion is far removed from the truth, and remote from any useful notion of adjudication. All Anglophone law schools, lawyers and judges are engaged in the process Dean Pound discusses. The common law tradition arose in England over the course of centuries. We imported it to this country in part because it was workable and practical, and because it was brilliantly and systematically expounded by Chief Justice Edward Coke in the 17th century and by Lord William Blackstone shortly before the American Revolution. No one would suggest that the common law tradition means the law is the captive of judges' subjective whims. Such an assertion would have sounded ludicrous to the English as well as to the founders. But as Strauss - and volumes of legal history - unsurprisingly demonstrate, the common law tradition is the key to constitutional interpretation. The common law is an inherently conservative instrument. It evolves incrementally. Those who complain about the "living Constitution" argue that judges merely rule according to their subjective prejudices. They contend that it is the legislative branch that should be charged with interpreting the Constitution. Of course, all three branches of government must interpret the Constitution from time to time. But the legislative branch should not have the last word in determining whether its own enactments meet constitutional scrutiny: To borrow from Chief Justice Coke, no one (including the legislature) may be the judge of his own cause. The function of determining whether legislation conforms to the Constitution has been and still is wisely confided to the courts, which by virtue of centuries of practice (as reflected in published opinions) have substantial expertise in the area and are independent. One also hears complaints that judges are insulated from reality. But courts are not insulated - they are independent. And they are independent precisely so they are not subject to being influenced by lobbyists or terrified by a challenger in a primary election. To show how the common law works, Strauss discusses the evolution of constitutional thought in relation to two major issues: freedom of speech and segregation in public schools. He explains how the "clear and present danger" test in freedom of speech cases evolved, implicating not just such considerations as the threat of imminent harm, but also that some kinds of speech have lower societal value (libel, obscenity, fighting words), while other kinds of speech have more societal value (great literature, political speech). Strauss goes on to discuss how Brown v. Board of Education (1954) was far less a radical overturning of an entrenched precedent, Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), than a logical step in the development of the law. In so doing, he uses an example from the law of torts, where customers injured by dangerous products originally were barred from suing the manufacturer unless they had a contractual relationship with it. At first, the fact that a product was inherently dangerous overcame the requirement of a contractual relationship. As it became harder to draw a line between ordinary products and those that were inherently dangerous, however, the old requirement of a contractual relationship was found to have outworn its purpose and customers were permitted to sue the manufacturer who had created a foreseeable risk of harm. Thus, in products liability cases, as in racial equality cases, the law evolved to meet the new demands posed by changed circumstances. Strauss shows the development of the law by discussing cases on racial equality decided after Plessy that gradually undercut the Plessy decision until it was no longer tenable. Strauss does what law professors do every day: teach the law by showing how it evolved. His explanation, however, is so concise and clear that it makes the discussion seem not just sensible but compelling. Thus we see that the law works. As Strauss points out, we never wrangle over some constitutional issues because they are cut and dried (you have to be 30 years old to be a senator) or because certainty is required (January 20 is the day the new president takes office, no matter how unstable the current domestic or world situation). Other provisions require more effort to interpret, but this is because the founders brilliantly provided that some matters could be spelled out specifically in advance, while others would have to be expressed in more general terms, which could be adjusted to changing needs and times (e.g., the "necessary and proper" clause in Article I, Sec. 8). Interestingly, Strauss does not consider amendments to the Constitution to be part of what makes it a living document, since the amendment process is so onerous, slow, and seldom used. He points out how some amendments merely ratified the status quo, or served to clean up outliers, resolved technical issues, or were ahead of their time. As he offers these judgments, which seem balanced and reasonable, he also explains some of the less familiar amendments in a way that will have readers raising their eyebrows and saying "Oh, so that's where that came from." At the outset of the book, Strauss sets out three objections to originalism: That it is often, as a practical matter, impossible even for professional historians to discover what the intentions were of various founders with respect to matters discussed in the Constitution. That even if an intent of the founders could be discovered, it would pertain to the understanding they had about their world: how does one go about trying to fit that understanding to our world? That as Thomas Jefferson pointed out, one generation is to another as one sovereign nation is to another. The world belongs to the living. The notions of people long dead cannot bind us in the present or future. Strauss correctly observes that the third of these objections is by itself fatal to originalism. The founders were not so impressed with themselves that they felt their "intentions" should be forever imposed on posterity. Had they been dedicated to such a dubious project, they would surely have done a better job of documenting their debates and compromises during the Philadelphia convention. But little remains of those deliberations aside from the notes kept by James Madison. The Constitution, moreover, reflects their understanding that the future could not be shackled forever to the time in which they lived. They realized that the slave trade, for example, would prove intolerable and therefore provided that it could be abolished by at least 1808. So was their "original intent" to permit the slave trade, or was it that the slave trade should be abolished? And what does this say, if anything, about their intentions toward the institution of slavery - a word that did not even appear in the Constitution until the Thirteenth Amendment was adopted in 1865? Most damning of all to the originalist position is what Thomas Jefferson said on the subject. In a letter dated July 12, 1816, to Samuel Kercheval, Jefferson wrote "Some men look at constitutions with sanctimonious reverence, and deem them like the arc of the covenant, too sacred to be touched. They ascribe to the men of the preceding age a wisdom more than human, and suppose what they did to be beyond amendment. I knew that age well; I belonged to it, and labored with it. It deserved well of its country. It was very like the present, but without the experience of the present; and forty years of experience in government is worth a century of book-reading; and this they would say themselves, were they to rise from the dead. I am certainly not an advocate for frequent and untried changes in laws and constitutions. I think moderate imperfections had better be borne with; because, when once known, we accommodate ourselves to them, and find practical means of correcting their ill effects. But I know also, that laws and institutions must go hand in hand with the progress of the human mind. As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths disclosed, and manners and opinions change with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also, and keep pace with the times. We might as well require a man to wear still the coat which fitted him when a boy, as civilized society to remain ever under the regimen of their barbarous ancestors." He added, "Let us follow no such examples nor weakly believe that one generation is not as capable as another of taking care of itself, and of ordering its own affairs." He even called for revision of the constitution at stated periods. While originalists would love to claim Jefferson as one of their own, his words - and indeed his whole life - prove that he was completely at odds with their approach. Men like Jefferson and Franklin, who were devotees of science, were fascinated by the progress men could make in trying to understand and improve their lives. Jefferson was an eager student of nature and did considerable experimentation with crops on his plantation. He famously wrote his "Notes on the State of Virginia" to refute the widely read claims of the French naturalist Buffon about the supposedly weak, degenerate, and insipid life forms to be found in the New World. The idea that such men, who were committed to the growth of knowledge, would seek to confine all future generations to the limited understanding they possessed of the universe in 1787, is worse than laughable. It can only be explained by the polemical purposes of those whose arguments for a regressive social order are so feeble that they have to seek refuge behind an imaginary "original intent" that they erect - as if the founders wanted their limited knowledge and often unarticulated, conflicting, or ambivalent intentions to restrict the great national experiment forever. Given the explicit language of Thomas Jefferson, quoted above, it is apparent that "originalism" actually belies and defies the express intent of Jefferson, one of the most eminent of the founders. It seems paradoxical but it was his original intent that his original intent should not govern future generations! Original intent also appears anomalously restrictive when one considers that the founders never contemplated the existence of an Air Force, though they expressly provided for the Army and the Navy. And ask an originalist what the original intent was with respect to the Second Amendment's use of the term "arms." The founders had no concept of assault rifles or machine guns, let alone nerve gas, laser-guided bombs, predator drones, or nuclear weapons. How do we impose an intention on them to assert what they could not have foreseen, namely, that ordinary householders in the 21st century should have a personal, constitutional right to be able to obliterate a small army in a matter of seconds, based on the founders' notions about the 18th century saber, musket or pistol? Likewise, the Eleventh Amendment says nothing to prohibit a person from suing her own state - just other states. Yet even "textualists" read an unwritten provision into the Eleventh Amendment because it suits their view of how "sovereign" the states should be. When given this kind of a taste of their own medicine, originalists collapse in helpless sputtering and exasperation. Exposed to Strauss' very sensible discussion, the concerns of originalists reflect opportunism and disingenuousness. After all, we should not expect lawyers and judges to become armchair historians, especially under the time pressures of litigation and in the face of hotly contested issues. We should not pretend the founders had some monolithic intent, least of all with respect to matters of which they had no concept. And as Jefferson pointed out, the relationship of one generation to another is like that of one sovereign nation to another: we cannot expect to bind future generations by the intentions of people who are long since dead. In short, there will always be those who resist change and those who welcome it. If you really want to see "judicial activism" at work, you will not find much of it in the common law tradition. A far better example is the recent decision - by the so-called conservatives on the Supreme Court - in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 18, 2010
B
Verified Purchase
Benjamin Douglass
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
An Excellent Read
Format: Kindle
The author talks about our constitution as a "living document" and expertly draws the distinction between this and the originalist interpretation as a "dead document."
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on October 5, 2018
F
Verified Purchase
Frederick S. Goethel
Pawtucket, US
★★★★★ 4
The Constitution: A Living or Static Document
Format: Hardcover
There has been a debate over the past several decades on whether the US Constitution is a living document that should be interpreted according to current mores and standards or whether it is a static document that should be interpreted using only the meaning found in the original wording of the document. The author, in this book, makes the case that the Constitution is, in fact, a living document that should be interpreted by modern standards and by using principles of common law. There are examples given that, quite frankly, are very persuasive. For instance, if the Constitution were interpreted using original language, we would not have the freedom of speech that we now enjoy. A careful reading of the First Amendment will show that only Congress was prohibited from making laws that abridged free speech. There were no constraints on the states or on other governmental bodies. Whether or not you agree with the author on how the Constitution should be interpreted, this book will make for some though provoking reading and interesting discussion. The book was well written, fairly easy to understand and should be read by all who are concerned about where the Supreme Court is now and where it is headed.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2010
G
Verified Purchase
garynini
Battle Creek, US
★★★★★ 5
Clear, cogent, and illuminating
Format: Kindle
Clear, cogent, and illuminating explanation of the difference between two approaches to interpreting the Constitution: originalism and the Living Constitution
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on September 18, 2015

recommand products

Vionic Men's Walker
120.00
Infinity 8lt pendant
232.94
Olympia T-2300-BN
103.70
Indigo Pyramid
119.00
Kid's Classic Mini II Boot Black
114.95