Pay in installments of $220.95 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
zkln5090 2rs 2ap xl inaTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: INA Synonym: 0015803700000 ZKLN5090 2RS 2AP ueres Breitenmae: 0,5 mm unteres Abma ueres Breitenmae: 0 mm oberes Abma Bezeichnung: ZKLN5090 2RS 2AP XL INA Marke: INA Erweiterte technische Daten 2AP Matched Pair (Twice The Number Of Bearings, Than Without 2AP) 2RS Rubber Seals At Each Side Of The Bearing ueres Breitenmae: mm 90,00 Axial Dynamic Load Rating Ca (N) 83000 Axial Static Load Rating C0a (N) 250000
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: INA |
| Synonym: 0015803700000 ZKLN5090-2RS-2AP |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: -0,5 mm unteres Abmaß |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: 0 mm oberes Abmaß |
| Bezeichnung: ZKLN5090-2RS-2AP-XL INA |
| Marke: INA |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| 2AP Matched Pair (Twice The Number Of Bearings, Than Without 2AP) |
| 2RS Rubber Seals At Each Side Of The Bearing |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße: mm 90,00 |
| Axial Dynamic Load Rating Ca (N) 83000 |
| Axial Static Load Rating C0a (N) 250000 |
| Begrenzungsdrehzahl für SchmierstoffLubrikation: (n G Fett) "3200.0000" |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 68,00 |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(b) mm 68,00 |
| ECLASS number 23-05-10-02 |
| ECLASS2 number 23-05-10-02 |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 1.76 |
| Innenmaße: mm 50,00 |
| Präzision Matched Pair |
| XL X-Life |
| -0,01 mm Außendurchmesser unteres Abmaß |
| -0,5 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß unteres Abmaß |
| -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| 0 mm Außendurchmesser oberes Abmaß |
| 0 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß oberes Abmaß |
| 0,3 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| 1,842 kg Gewicht |
| 1.500 1/min thermisch zulässige Drehzahl |
| 10,48 kg*cm2 Massenträgheitsmoment |
| 120 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| 15.300 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, axial |
| 2,5 µm Planlauf |
| 2.200 N/µm Steifigkeit axial |
| 2.250 Nm/mrad Kippsteifigkeit |
| 250.000 N statische Tragzahl, axial |
| 63 mm Mindestdurchmesser der Welle |
| 68 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| 83.000 N dynamische Tragzahl, axial |
| 85 Nm Anziehdrehmoment für die empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter |
| AM50 Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter axial klemmbar |
| B 68 mm Äußeres Breitenmaße: |
| C 0a 250.000 N statische Tragzahl, axial |
| C a 83.000 N dynamische Tragzahl, axial |
| C ua 15.300 N Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung, axial |
| M A 85 Nm Anziehdrehmoment für die empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter |
| M m 10,48 kg*cm2 Massenträgheitsmoment |
| T max 120 °C Betriebstemperatur max. |
| T min -30 °C Betriebstemperatur min. |
| ZMA50/75 Empfohlene INA-Präzisionsnutmutter radial klemmbar |
| c aL 2.200 N/µm Steifigkeit axial |
| c kL 2.250 Nm/mrad Kippsteifigkeit |
| d =a min 63 mm Mindestdurchmesser der Welle |
| n ϑ 1.500 1/min thermisch zulässige Drehzahl |
| r 1 min 0,6 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| r min 0,3 mm Minimaler Kantenabstand |
| ≈m 1,842 kg Einzelgewicht |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Fascinating and beautifully written.
Format: Hardcover
Clear and compelling reading of the much-neglected history of Carthage -- all its histories had been written by the victors in Rome. BTEW y four-colour photo insert was missing a page....shame on Norton, the puboisher.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 25, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Excellent Overview of Carthage
Format: Hardcover
293 pages of text/maps/b&w figures; 8 pages of color plates; 15 pages of end notes (mostly citations); 20 page Bibliography; 6 page Primary Bibliography; 2 page Acknowledgements; 8 area maps; 1 battle map [Cannae]. This is a well written history of Carthage. It provides a one source overview of the background and history of the city/empire. As a reasonably well read layperson, I am familiar at an overview level with the Punic Wars, Rome, Alexander, and the Alexandrine successor states and this book packaged Carthaginian information very well while adding interesting information that I hadn't come across before. I was somewhat disappointed (hence the 4 star rather than 5 star rating) that there was a very limited drill down to a lower level of detail, particularly from such a noted author. However, this is probably an unfair criticism given the limited amount of archeological information available and the millennia of effort that has been spent in pigeonholing Carthage according to the desired perceptions. I recommend the book highly as a well written overview of Carthage.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 2, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Brilliant book
Format: Hardcover
Brilliant book. An insightful synthesis of history, myth, and archaeology. Highly recommend.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 22, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Excellent
Format: Hardcover
Excellent
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 7, 2026
★★★★★ 4
Great substance; lousy writing.
Format: Kindle
Reviewing this book is not an easy task. Previously I had very limited knowledge of this period of history. With no background, I found the subject spellbinding. The author has done a wonderful job of gathering, and reconciling, ancient sources of mixed reliability. But, in undertaking that task, the text becomes repetitive, difficult to follow and frankly just plain boring. In addition, the writing style and format detracts substantially from the pleasure of learning from the substance. Everything from run-on sentences with mixed subjects to unclear antecedents, to character confusion because of similarity of names and the author's expectation that one can remember which player is on stage at any given moment. My main criticism of the book is that the downsides could have been avoided by application of the skills of a decent editor who instinctively would have addressed and corrected the confusion in presentation that made it a very difficult read. I hope that a cleaned up edition is prepared and the book released again; I think the effort would be worth the result.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 21, 2026