
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 8 - Jul 13
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
AF1616 AIR FILTER PRIMARYCross References Brand Manufacturer Part Number Alliance ABPN10GAF1616 Baldwin PA2493, AF580, LL2493 Carquest 87941 Caterpillar 7C8313, 3I0774, 3I0293 Donaldson P181016, P128494, P182016, DBA5016 Fleetguard (Main Product) AF1616 Fram CA2588, CA2539 General Motors (GMC) 8881290, 25041980 Luber Finer LAF8494, LAF8494MXM Mack 2MD3156P3, 2MD3161P3 Motorcraft FA711 NAPA 2941 PAI FAF4569 White 220054401, 220055002, 220054406 Wix 42941, 42941NP Technical
Cross References
| Brand / Manufacturer | Part Number |
|---|---|
| Alliance | ABPN10GAF1616 |
| Baldwin | PA2493, AF580, LL2493 |
| Carquest | 87941 |
| Caterpillar | 7C8313, 3I0774, 3I0293 |
| Donaldson | P181016, P128494, P182016, DBA5016 |
| Fleetguard (Main Product) | AF1616 |
| Fram | CA2588, CA2539 |
| General Motors (GMC) | 8881290, 25041980 |
| Luber-Finer | LAF8494, LAF8494MXM |
| Mack | 2MD3156P3, 2MD3161P3 |
| Motorcraft | FA711 |
| NAPA | 2941 |
| PAI | FAF4569 |
| White | 220054401, 220055002, 220054406 |
| Wix | 42941, 42941NP |
Technical Specifications
| Feature | Details / Value |
|---|---|
| Product Type | Heavy-Duty Primary Engine Air Filter Element |
| Filter Shape | Round Cylindrical |
| Seal Type | Axial Seal Configuration |
| Media Material | Premium Cellulose Media (High Contaminant Capacity) |
| Overall Height / Length | 27.00 inches (685.80 mm) |
| Largest Outside Diameter (O.D.) | 10.402 inches (264.21 mm) |
| End 1 Inside Diameter (I.D.) | 6.048 inches (153.62 mm) |
| End 2 Outside Diameter (O.D.) | 10.402 inches (264.21 mm) |
| Efficiency Test Standard | ISO 5011 Certified |
| VMRS Code | 041-001-005 |
Applications & Compatibility Guide
| Category | Usage & Compatible Equipment Models |
|---|---|
| Recommended Use | • Designed for heavy-duty commercial trucks, construction machinery, and industrial engines operating under rigorous conditions. • Functions as the primary (outer) defense layer within the air intake module to block atmospheric dust and dirt from entering the combustion cylinder. |
| Compatible Brands & Platforms | • Caterpillar (CAT) & Case Equipment: - Optimized for earthmoving, excavation, and heavy industrial machinery utilizing matched CAT or Case engine setups. • GMC & Chevrolet Medium/Heavy Duty Trucks: - Topkick, Kodiak, and traditional commercial chassis configurations running matching heavy-duty intake designs. - Fabricated/Supported in individual model years: 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006. • Mack & White Heavy Fleets: - Compatible with vintage and regional vocational models depending on the original assembly filter footprint. |
| Purpose & Function | • Traps soot, fine dust, pollen, and microscopic road particles before the raw intake airstream makes contact with the combustion chambers. • Ensures a continuous supply of clean, purified air, optimizing the engine’s air-to-fuel ratio, boosting fuel economy, and shielding internal engine hardware against accelerated particulate wear. |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.5 ★★★★★
Based on 1749 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Great jeans for work
Size: 36W x 36L, Color: Vintage Indigo
I generally do not buy wranglers, but needed some work jeans, nice loose fit, very comfortable, size 36x36 waas spot on
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Muy bueno pantalones. Ordering a few more pairs
Size: 48W x 30L Big, Color: Vintage Indigo
God bless the USA
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 8, 2026
★★★★★ 5
I’m satisfied
Size: 42W x 34L Long, Color: Antique Navy
Fits great, and the pair I had previously are going on 4 years old and still wearable. Definitely worth the price
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Jeans that fit!!!!!!!*
Size: 38W x 36L, Color: Antique Navy
These jeans are a good fit for me. Very satisfied.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 23, 2026
★★★★★ 3
These were my new "Go To" jeans, not so much after a wearing for a year
Size: 35W x 32L, Color: Antique Indigo, Size: 35W x 32L, Color: Antique Indigo
Love 'em already after only one day of wearing them. I am a 7 days a week, jeans wearing kind of guy pretty much. Office job and recreation. I got scared away from my usual beloved ***tco jeans because of the bad reviews on their site for their now "Made in China" 12.99 jeans which used to be made in Mexico. So off to Amazon to shop for my first Amazon clothes purchase. Found these Antique Indigo Wrangler jeans for just under double the warehouse price. Advantage was they had the exact size I wanted (35Wx32L) vs settling for either 34W or 36W at the warehouse. The waist size was exact. I measured the waist by folding the waist in half and measuring with a tape measure. 17.5 inches exactly (17.5" X 2 = 35"). Didn't measure the length. Color seems to be a tad darker than the Antique Indigo pictured on the website. To me they seem to be in between the Antique Indigo and Antique Navy in color, but that is just my opinion. I guess it could be monitor differences. Doesn't matter to me. Not sure it matters to anyone (it doesn't to me) but I decided to weigh these and compare them to my very worn 34x32 warehouse jeans. These were exactly 30ounces. The warehouse jeans were 27 ounces. These are Made in Mexico of US materials as stated on the tag. These will be my new go to jeans, even at double my usual price, until ***tco goes back to the old Mexican manufacturer. Yes, this is my real opinion not influenced by free or reduced price product for providing a review.
Update March 21, 2017: So, here it is a year later. How do they measure up now? I have changed my review from 5 to 3 stars for the following reasons:
1. Weak patch (1/2 star deduction) - The Wrangler "patch" on the back has either ripped or started "peeling" off on two of three pairs purchased. Not that big of a deal as I just remove it completely when it starts hanging. The patch is made of some leatherish paper is the way I would describe it. Doesn't really seem to be cloth and certainly isn't leather. Would be nice and longer lasting if it was real leather.
2. Manufacturing variation (1/2 star deduction) - One pair of the three is maybe one inch shorter than the others. The length of two pairs is the same and long enough to lay on my shoes with a bit to spare. The other pair just barely makes it to my shoes. Not a deal breaker but I am conscious of that pair being shorter when I wear them.
3. Short pocket flaps (1 star deduction) - Not sure how to describe this. The part of the denim that enters the pocket and to which the white pocket material is sewn to, doesn't go deep enough into the pocket. The result is that this part partially pulls out of the pocket (or almost so), making the white pocket material marginally visible. I am very frequently aware of my pocket whites being displayed to the world and am frequently tucking them or pushing them back in. This is the worst aspect of these jeans for me. This might just be an aspect of the way these jeans fit on my body shape. If this denim part that enters into the pocket were just 1/2" or 1" deeper into the pocket, this would not be a problem.
So far the durability of the jeans is great, other than the Wrangler patch. They don't really have to survive much in my day-to-day use of them, as I work in an office setting and don't wear a belt with my jeans, but they seem to be a match for the warehouse jeans I used to purchase. Would I buy again? To be honest, I would probably try another brand or maybe another style within the Wrangler family and only come back to these if I could not find anything better based on price and performance. These are okay jeans and I will continue to wear them to the end of their life.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 11, 2016