Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 12 - Jul 17
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Solid 14k White Gold 6x4mm Oval Simulated Emerald VS CZ RingMaterial: Primary Purity: 14K Finish: Polished Stone Type_1: Emerald Stone Type_2: CZ Stone Color_1: Green Stone Color_2: White Stone Quantity_1: 1 Stone Quantity_2: 4 Plating: Rhodium Band Width: 1. 5 to 3. 5 mm (tapered) Stone Weight_1: 0. 42 ct Stone Weight_2: 0. 015 ct Stone Clarity_2: VS2 SI1 (VS) Material: Primary: Gold Completeness: Complete (all stones included) Stone Shape_1: Oval Stone Shape_2: Round Stone Size_1: 6. 00 x 4. 00 mm Stone
Material: Primary - Purity: 14KFinish: Polished
Stone Type_1: Emerald
Stone Type_2: CZ
Stone Color_1: Green
Stone Color_2: White
Stone Quantity_1: 1
Stone Quantity_2: 4
Plating: Rhodium
Band Width: 1.5 to 3.5 mm (tapered)
Stone Weight_1: 0.42 ct
Stone Weight_2: 0.015 ct
Stone Clarity_2: VS2/SI1 (VS)
Material: Primary: Gold
Completeness: Complete (all stones included)
Stone Shape_1: Oval
Stone Shape_2: Round
Stone Size_1: 6.00 x 4.00 mm
Stone Size_2: 1.5 mm
Stone Treatment_1: Oiling/Resin
Product Type: Jewelry
Jewelry Type: Rings
Sold By Unit: Each
Gender: Women's
Material: Primary - Color: White
Ring Type: Gemstone
Stone Cut_1: Faceted
Stone Cut_2: Faceted
Stone Creation Method_1: Natural
Stone Creation Method_2: Natural
Birthstone Month_1: (05) May
Birthstone Month_2: (04) April
Stone Color Grade_2: G-I
Stone Quality_1: A
Product ID: X9734E-VS
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 2180 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Never got to try it because it was broken
Color: Black
Came with a broken piece and is taking forever to get a refund…there wasn’t an option for a replacement
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 15, 2026
★★★★★ 3
Room divider
Color: Black, Color: Black
It was much simpler than anticipated. I don't think it's very sturdy and it lacks weight, but it's attractive.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 20, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Great product
Color: Black
This is very sturdy and great quality. Its quite cheap for what your getting to it’s not cheap thin like plastic it feels thick and you could put a LITTLE weight on it it’s stable and protects your privacy.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 16, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Versatile Room Divider With Easy Assembly and Strong Coverage
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
I picked up this Siebwin 3-panel folding room divider mainly for privacy and room separation, and overall it works very well.
Assembly is very straightforward, and the divider can be set up, taken apart, and stored without much effort. The fabric quality feels good, and the frame construction is stronger and more stable than expected. The support tubes especially feel well built and help keep the divider standing securely.
One feature I really liked is the flexibility of the design. The panels can be used together as a complete divider or separated depending on the setup and available space. That makes it much more versatile for different room layouts or temporary privacy needs.
The coverage is also very good, and the size matches the manufacturer’s description accurately. The fabric blocks light and background visibility well enough to provide solid privacy without feeling overly heavy. The wider feet also help improve stability compared to thinner folding dividers.
Another positive detail is that everything arrived complete with no missing parts or damaged pieces, which made assembly much easier and faster.
Compared to cheaper privacy screens, this one feels more durable and easier to customize depending on the situation. In terms of value for the money, it feels like a very practical and worthwhile purchase considering the size, flexibility, and build quality.
Overall, a versatile and well-built room divider with easy assembly, strong privacy coverage, stable construction, complete included parts, flexible panel configuration, and excellent everyday functionality.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 27, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Stable, flexible in deployment configuration, creates true privacy and looks great.
Size: 3 Panel 12FT W
This is the second room divider panel I have installed, and there are several features about this one that I like much better than my older one.
The fact that there are no gaps and that the material is thicker means you get more privacy or more hiding power, if you wish. My older divider has vertical spaces between each of the panels and the panels are half as wide as the Siebwin panels, so there are many vertical spaces. The Siebwin divider really creates privacy.
Another feature that I really appreciate is that the legs are wider and stand off from the floor. On my older one the legs are flat and they're rather awkward to adjust because they create more drag on the floor. The feet on the older one also loosen if you turn them counter clockwise, so adjustments of configuration that require the feet to be moved are more complex.
The older divider also must be deployed in a zig-zag fashion because he feet are not as wide, but this new one can be deployed and stable in a straight, an "N" shape or an arc. They are both the same length, but because the older one must be use in a zig-zag deployment it doesn't reach to the length of the new one.
The Siebwin divider definitely costs more at $103.48, but it sports several features and advantages over the other brand, so it does a better job and is worth the extra cost.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 25, 2026