Pay in installments of $40.95 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 18 - Jul 23
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
7221 BECBM SKFTechnische Basisdaten Hersteller: SKF ueres Breitenma: 36 mm Ermdungsgrenzbelastung: 5. 2 kN Gewicht: 4183 Gramm Grenzdrehzahl: 5 300 r min Grenzwert: e: 1. 14 Herstellungsland: sterreich Referenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r min Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 Erweiterte technische Daten ueres Breitenmae:(D) mm 190,00 Axialluft Spannung CB Normal Axial Clearance BE Single Row Angular Contact Ball Bearing With A 40 Contact Angle And Optimized Internal Design ueres
Technische Basisdaten
| Hersteller: SKF |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß: 36 mm |
| Ermüdungsgrenzbelastung: 5.2 kN |
| Gewicht: 4183 Gramm |
| Grenzdrehzahl: 5 300 r/min |
| Grenzwert: e: 1.14 |
| Herstellungsland: Österreich |
| Referenzdrehzahl: 4 000 r/min |
| Zolltarifnummer: 8482 1090 |
Erweiterte technische Daten
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(D) mm 190,00 |
| Axialluft/Spannung CB - Normal Axial Clearance |
| BE Single Row Angular Contact Ball Bearing With A 40° Contact Angle And Optimized Internal Design |
| Äußeres Breitenmaße:(B) mm 36,00 |
| CB Bearing For Universal Matching. Two Bearings Arranged Back-To-Back Or Face-To-Face Will Have A Normal Axial Internal Clearance Before Mounting |
| Einzelgewicht in (kg): 4.1829 |
| Innenmaße:(d) mm 105,00 |
| M Machined Window-Type Brass Cage, Ball Centered, Different Designs Are Identified By A Figure, e.g. M1 |
| Paarung Keine Paarung |
| 36 mm Äußeres Breitenmaß |
| 80 mm Abstand zwischen Stirnseite und Druckpunkt |
| Anzahl der Reihen 1 |
| Axiallastfaktor (Einzel Tandem): Y0: 0.26 |
| Axiallastfaktor (Einzel Tandem): Y2: 0.57 |
| Berührungswinkel 40 ° |
| Beschichtung Ohne |
| Äußeres Breitenmaß 36 mm |
| Dynamische Tragzahl 156 kN |
| Dynamische Tragzahl: 156 kN |
| Einzelgewicht 4.16 kg |
| Grenzdrehzahl 5 300 r/min |
| Kontakttyp Normaler Kontakt (Zwei-Punktkontakt) |
| Minimaler Axiallastfaktor: 0.302 |
| Minimaler Radialbelastungsfaktor: kr0.095 |
| Nachschmierfunktion Ohne |
| Passungsanordnung Kein(e) |
| Radiallastfaktor (Einzel Tandem): X: 0.35 |
| Referenzdrehzahl 4 000 r/min |
| Statische Tragzahl 150 kN |
| Statische Tragzahl: 150 kN |
| UNSPSC-Code 31171531 |
| eClass-Code 23-05-08-03 |
| max.1 mm Radius der Rundung |
| max.2 mm Radius der Rundung |
| min.1.1 mm Kantenabstand |
| min.2.1 mm Kantenabstand |
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
4.8 ★★★★★
Based on 25 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 1
Not functional
Tree part is very cheaply made plastic material and does not fit well into the stand at all
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 30, 2026
★★★★★ 2
Don’t bother, not worth the $
Much smaller in person than it appears. Looks more like a piece of coral than a tree. I got this to display some ornaments for sale at craft fairs, but it’s so small, it looks silly with the ornaments on it. Super flimsy, made of cheap plastic. Definitely not worth $14. Will be returning.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 12, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Durable
Very durable and can hold a few pieces
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on February 4, 2026
★★★★★ 5
Cute
Just as described, perfect for putting rings and bracelets on. I put lines on the branches to resemble a birch tree . Its good value for the money
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 8, 2025
★★★★★ 1
Cheaply Made
Not worth the money it costs imo
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 14, 2026